<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dennis Prager: Interesting, but wrong</title>
	<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/02/24/dennis-prager-interesting-but-wrong/</link>
	<description>Kickin' ass on the lyin' side:  A never-ending battle against stupid, ugly, deceitful and corrupt right-wing water carriers...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/02/24/dennis-prager-interesting-but-wrong/#comment-862</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/02/24/dennis-prager-interesting-but-wrong/#comment-862</guid>
		<description>Mike,

You need more practice.  You were so nervous I could hear it in your voice.  But Prager was kind and only gently quashed your argument (which was what again?  politicians need to be saints?  or only Republican politicians need be?)

And of course he spoke over you... what did you expect.  No radio entertainment personality is going to give up his show to you or anyone else.  The nice thing about Prager, though, is he does not insult anyone, and only very rarely (once or twice a year) looses his temper.

Politics is a difficult business but who is to blame for the politicians that lead us for cutting ethical corners (Republican &#38; Democrat).  We are.  Those of us who would rather watch TV than vote on election day.  Those of us who use passion and emotion to decide the issues of our time rather than reason and serious thought.

I do need to revisit the South Carolina issue... you may have a point about Rove and President Bush.

Have a nice day and enjoy your little bloging thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>You need more practice.  You were so nervous I could hear it in your voice.  But Prager was kind and only gently quashed your argument (which was what again?  politicians need to be saints?  or only Republican politicians need be?)</p>
<p>And of course he spoke over you&#8230; what did you expect.  No radio entertainment personality is going to give up his show to you or anyone else.  The nice thing about Prager, though, is he does not insult anyone, and only very rarely (once or twice a year) looses his temper.</p>
<p>Politics is a difficult business but who is to blame for the politicians that lead us for cutting ethical corners (Republican &amp; Democrat).  We are.  Those of us who would rather watch TV than vote on election day.  Those of us who use passion and emotion to decide the issues of our time rather than reason and serious thought.</p>
<p>I do need to revisit the South Carolina issue&#8230; you may have a point about Rove and President Bush.</p>
<p>Have a nice day and enjoy your little bloging thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mixter</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/02/24/dennis-prager-interesting-but-wrong/#comment-166</link>
		<author>Mixter</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/02/24/dennis-prager-interesting-but-wrong/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>MM, you're saying that it's okay for immoral or amoral people to tell the rest of us what our morals should be?

Wrong.  The analogy was way off base, and shouldn't have been used.

Mixter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MM, you&#8217;re saying that it&#8217;s okay for immoral or amoral people to tell the rest of us what our morals should be?</p>
<p>Wrong.  The analogy was way off base, and shouldn&#8217;t have been used.</p>
<p>Mixter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/02/24/dennis-prager-interesting-but-wrong/#comment-161</link>
		<author>MM</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 04:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/02/24/dennis-prager-interesting-but-wrong/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Again, I see your argument falling short and the point Dennis made ringing true. 

At least you answered his question honestly, but in doing so, you've revealed the speciousness of the point you were trying to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Again, I see your argument falling short and the point Dennis made ringing true. </p>
<p>At least you answered his question honestly, but in doing so, you&#8217;ve revealed the speciousness of the point you were trying to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mixter</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/02/24/dennis-prager-interesting-but-wrong/#comment-152</link>
		<author>Mixter</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/02/24/dennis-prager-interesting-but-wrong/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Oh, wow.  These wingnuts are truly certifiable.  Prager is a loo-loo!

Great idea for a blog/podcast, by the way.  I'm blogrolling you the minute I get outta here.

Mixter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, wow.  These wingnuts are truly certifiable.  Prager is a loo-loo!</p>
<p>Great idea for a blog/podcast, by the way.  I&#8217;m blogrolling you the minute I get outta here.</p>
<p>Mixter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bodhi</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/02/24/dennis-prager-interesting-but-wrong/#comment-131</link>
		<author>bodhi</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/02/24/dennis-prager-interesting-but-wrong/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Whoa whoa WHOA.

Morality is not necessary to make good decisions on behalf of your constituents?  I'd LOVE to get some clips of this guy -- provided he was on during this time -- lambasting Clinton for getting a blowjob.  What was the rallying cry of the conservatives then?  I'll tell you what it was.

"CHARACTER MATTERS."

I don't think Rush could utter a sentence without those two words sneaking in for a full year.

In fact you don't even need a clip of this guy, ANY clips of the Bush-bubble cadre would do just fine.  Corruption doesn't matter so long as you're fscking the public and not an intern?

I'm putting this clip into my next podcast.

Regards,
bodhi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa whoa WHOA.</p>
<p>Morality is not necessary to make good decisions on behalf of your constituents?  I&#8217;d LOVE to get some clips of this guy &#8212; provided he was on during this time &#8212; lambasting Clinton for getting a blowjob.  What was the rallying cry of the conservatives then?  I&#8217;ll tell you what it was.</p>
<p>&#8220;CHARACTER MATTERS.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Rush could utter a sentence without those two words sneaking in for a full year.</p>
<p>In fact you don&#8217;t even need a clip of this guy, ANY clips of the Bush-bubble cadre would do just fine.  Corruption doesn&#8217;t matter so long as you&#8217;re fscking the public and not an intern?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m putting this clip into my next podcast.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
bodhi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
