<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hugh Hewitt:  poopyhead</title>
	<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/01/hugh-hewitt-poopyhead/</link>
	<description>Kickin' ass on the lyin' side:  A never-ending battle against stupid, ugly, deceitful and corrupt right-wing water carriers...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  8 Sep 2008 02:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: bobert</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/01/hugh-hewitt-poopyhead/#comment-2737</link>
		<author>bobert</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/01/hugh-hewitt-poopyhead/#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>hey im a poopy head too!!!!!!!!!!! go team</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey im a poopy head too!!!!!!!!!!! go team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Anusoff</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/01/hugh-hewitt-poopyhead/#comment-278</link>
		<author>Jack Anusoff</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/01/hugh-hewitt-poopyhead/#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Oh no, he was a Democrat, but he was very pro-Bush and pro-war. 

Shya!!! And are those monkeys I feel flying out of my butt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, he was a Democrat, but he was very pro-Bush and pro-war. </p>
<p>Shya!!! And are those monkeys I feel flying out of my butt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/01/hugh-hewitt-poopyhead/#comment-260</link>
		<author>ron</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/01/hugh-hewitt-poopyhead/#comment-260</guid>
		<description>can you explain the result of 90% of the troops think they are in iraq to get saddam for his supporting role in 9-11?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you explain the result of 90% of the troops think they are in iraq to get saddam for his supporting role in 9-11?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Lyceum &#187; Get the Republicans some cheese</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/01/hugh-hewitt-poopyhead/#comment-215</link>
		<author>Progressive Lyceum &#187; Get the Republicans some cheese</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 10:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/01/hugh-hewitt-poopyhead/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>[...] As Mike Stark observes, the preferred wingnut reaction to these polls is to bitch about the methodology. In Mike&#8217;s case, he&#8217;s taking on Hugh Hewitt&#8217;s skeptical reaction to the new Zogby poll showing that an overwhelming majority of our soldiers in Iraq think we should end the occupation within one year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As Mike Stark observes, the preferred wingnut reaction to these polls is to bitch about the methodology. In Mike&#8217;s case, he&#8217;s taking on Hugh Hewitt&#8217;s skeptical reaction to the new Zogby poll showing that an overwhelming majority of our soldiers in Iraq think we should end the occupation within one year. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
