Comments on: Next Target http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/10/next-target/ Kickin' ass on the lyin' side: A never-ending battle against stupid, ugly, deceitful and corrupt right-wing water carriers... Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:51:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: marc forrest http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/10/next-target/#comment-721 marc forrest Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:20:52 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/10/next-target/#comment-721 great site... it's about time... i linked your site on my toonreviews page, check it out - click homepage tws great site…

it’s about time…

i linked your site on my toonreviews page, check it out - click homepage

tws

]]> By: Dave Zappo http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/10/next-target/#comment-710 Dave Zappo Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:54:14 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/10/next-target/#comment-710 Great job -- great site. Are you keeping after O'Lielly? Are people calling him? I would love to hear more O'Lielly clips. Keep after Bill till he blows his gasket. Someone needs to sue Fox News Security. Great job — great site.

Are you keeping after O’Lielly? Are people calling him? I would love to hear more O’Lielly clips.
Keep after Bill till he blows his gasket. Someone needs to sue Fox News Security.

]]> By: Samwise Galenorn http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/10/next-target/#comment-708 Samwise Galenorn Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:40:22 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/10/next-target/#comment-708 The abortion question has to be framed into reality. Consider right wing idiots who want to outlaw all abortions, or those who want to outlaw abortions except in the case of rape. For the first case, that would mean opening up a homicide investigation in the event of a miscarriage. Or having an abortion police force. I'm not sure, but I'm pretty certain that we have never sent a woman to prison for having an abortion. Ever. That means, the country would have to do something it has never done before: Charging a woman with murder because she received an abortion. For the second case, imagine that a woman has been raped. If she wanted an abortion, that means she has to prove that she's been raped. Period. What threshold would be required to prove rape? What about date rape? What about a prostitute who was raped? What about the woman gets drunk, someone rapes her and she doesn't know who it was? What about a husband who rapes his wife? How long of a proof period is required before the courts grant permission for an abortion? Right winged idiots are not in the realm of reality. It is up to us on the left to remind people that we don't live in fantasy land, but in the land of reality. The abortion question has to be framed into reality.
Consider right wing idiots who want to outlaw all abortions, or those who want to outlaw abortions except in the case of rape.

For the first case, that would mean opening up a homicide investigation in the event of a miscarriage. Or having an abortion police force. I’m not sure, but I’m pretty certain that we have never sent a woman to prison for having an abortion. Ever. That means, the country would have to do something it has never done before: Charging a woman with murder because she received an abortion.

For the second case, imagine that a woman has been raped. If she wanted an abortion, that means she has to prove that she’s been raped. Period. What threshold would be required to prove rape? What about date rape? What about a prostitute who was raped? What about the woman gets drunk, someone rapes her and she doesn’t know who it was? What about a husband who rapes his wife? How long of a proof period is required before the courts grant permission for an abortion?

Right winged idiots are not in the realm of reality. It is up to us on the left to remind people that we don’t live in fantasy land, but in the land of reality.

]]> By: cosmo http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/10/next-target/#comment-706 cosmo Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:57:14 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/10/next-target/#comment-706 Based on what I'm seeing the last few days, I think the Democrats really need to start harping on the message that "Republicans are Racists". It's true, for one thing. And there's so much proof to back it up (Katrina photos are priceless). And it's a topic that the left can generate a lot of traction with - sort of like the Neocons when they talk about gay-marriage... We need to start asking these wingnuts questions that will paint the picture of how out of touch they and their ilk are - not sure what the questions should be, but I'm giving it some thought and will post any good ones I can think of. Based on what I’m seeing the last few days, I think the Democrats really need to start harping on the message that “Republicans are Racists”. It’s true, for one thing. And there’s so much proof to back it up (Katrina photos are priceless). And it’s a topic that the left can generate a lot of traction with - sort of like the Neocons when they talk about gay-marriage…

We need to start asking these wingnuts questions that will paint the picture of how out of touch they and their ilk are - not sure what the questions should be, but I’m giving it some thought and will post any good ones I can think of.

]]> By: Douggie G. http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/10/next-target/#comment-704 Douggie G. Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:32:34 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/10/next-target/#comment-704 I think you would have to get them Social Security numbers first, but that's just the kind of slippery slope we need. Bottle up the courts for a while on that one, and when they rule that they are not people and can't have SS numbers, take that decision back to strike down the Rapist Protection Act. I think you would have to get them Social Security numbers first, but that’s just the kind of slippery slope we need. Bottle up the courts for a while on that one, and when they rule that they are not people and can’t have SS numbers, take that decision back to strike down the Rapist Protection Act.

]]>