I know you’re really bad at understanding the law and how it works, But that Florida law only covers recording that are actually made IN Florida. If Mike is making the recording in a state that does not require consent of both parties then his conduct is legal. It doens’t matter where his calls go to or come from, jurisdiction is based on where the recording is made.

I suppose Florida could write it’s law in such a way that it made the recording illegal regardless of where it took place, but there is a good chance this would go beyond their jurisdiction, and generally speaking, the courts will look at WHERE the recording took place -such as in crminal cases where an informant records his phone calls with a suspect.

The President’s #1 duty is to protect the US. Protecting the US invovles gathering intel on our enemies, in this case terrorists. It is unfornate that you do not consider this worthy of gathering info on

Sadly, no.

Read Article II of the Constitution:

Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:–”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.“

The Presidents job is to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” I don’t think it’s his job to be the protective authoritarian father figure to all you cowardly right-wing chicken-shit pants pissers. If you want to give up the freedoms our founding fathers fought for, move to North Korea.

Florida (where Rush has his show) law says:

“Fla. Stat. ch. 934.03: All parties must consent to the recording or the disclosure of the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication in Florida. Recording or disclosing without the consent of all parties is a felony, unless the interception is a first offense committed without any illegal purpose, and not for commercial gain, or the communication is the radio portion of a cellular conversation. Such first offenses and the interception of cellular communications are misdemeanors. State v. News-Press Pub. Co., 338 So. 2d 1313 (1976), State v. Tsavaris, 394 So. 2d 418 (1981).”

“Anyone whose communications have been illegally intercepted may recover actual damages or $100 for each day of violation or $1,000, whichever is greater, along with punitive damages, attorney fees and litigation costs. Fla. Stat. ch. 934.10.”

If I were you, you better get a good lawyer. You are a felon.

“chuck 2″ (Notice the space between chuck and 2)

Now look we posted the response that mentions “liberal faggots” It’s ” chuck2 ” without a space between chuck and 2.

One of you people tried to forge my name and make an inflammatory comment. THAT IS LOW. AND VERY VERY CHILDISH.

What a disgrace. Have you people nothing better to do? Can you not have a discussion with someone of the other side? Can you tolerate hearing over points of view? How low of the person that forged my name and made an inflammatory comment.