The bind we’re in
Published by Mike Stark March 19th, 2006 in UncategorizedDigby has a great piece up about conventional wisdom and gutless democrats and journalists inside the beltway.
The conventional wisdom in DC has now ossified into a reflexive notion that Democrats must do nothing. Ever. They must hold back and say nothing when the Republicans are on top and they must hold back and say nothing when they are on the ropes.
…
Clinton had an approval rating in the 50’s. The country was in the midst of the greatest expansion in history. The entire world looked to us to lead them through the post cold war world. Yet Republicans insisted on impeaching him for lying about a sexual indiscretion That’s a personal vendetta.
This president is in the low 30’s. Most Americans hardly feel the good news in the economy because the benefits have been rigged to go to those who make more than $250,0000 a year. He’s made a fetish out of abusing his power with a non-stop assault on the contitution, international law and civilized norms. He has asserted a principle of executive authority that says he does not have to abide by the law. And it’s extreme to think this deserves a mild rebuke from the body that writes those laws in the first place?
And I shouldn’t have to point out that since the Republicans impeached president Clinton, among other things, they have increased their majority in the congress, won two presidential elections, enacted every wet dream tax cut they ever had, rolled back every regulation they ever hated and installed two right wing ideologues on the court. And that doesn’t even begin to cover it.
Yes, the Republicans have certainly paid a steep price for impeachment, haven’t they?
…
If the Democrats lose in November, I’m sure she’ll find plenty of reasons to blame Democrats, but it won’t occur to her that the reason people didn’t vote for the D’s was because the party listened to people like her and campaigned like a herd of neutered animals instead of listening to their hearts, their minds, their constituents and their leaders who were prepared to take a stand for what we believe in. No, they’ll blame the “extremists” who want a safety net and a sane terrorism policy — and leaders who defend the constitution. It couldn’t possibly be that their tired, stale reflexive passivity is to blame when half the base fails to turn out because they just. have. no. hope.
Jane picks up the baton and adds some interesting context:
Can someone explain to me how forcing the Republicans torallyy around an unpopular President just as they’re trying to distance themselves from him is going to hurt the Democrats?
…
Not only is Russ Feingold rallying a disspirited base frustrated with lack of leadership on the part of big Senate Democrats, this is a full-on disaster for the GOP in November.
So let me add my fears.
What happens if, by some fortuitous confluence of events, the spineless democratic party does manage to retake, oh, let’s say for argument’s sake, both the House and the Senate… despite cowering before Republicans all election season?
Let’s assume that the corruption, incompetence and deriliction of duty that so characterizes today’s Republican party finally hits home in the living rooms across the country. Fed up, the few that do turn out to vote are so swept up with anti republican, anti-incumbent fervor that every close race breaks to the Democrats…
Do you see where I’m going?
All of a sudden, there will be a legitimization of the DC consultant/pundit class… all of these dunderheads that encouraged Democrats to hunker down in their foxholes while the enemy was out of ammo, out of leadership and out of room to manuever… the same idiot-class of DC lemmings will surely stake a claim to wisdom and sagery….
that, my friends, will absolutely kill me…
Please God, show me the way! I don’t want to see Bob Shrum, Susan Estrich and Evan Beyh spouting forth with their condascending tut-tutting for the next two years…
I don’t want to live under a republican Congress for the next two years.
The latter would be worse than the former, but if we turn the ‘08 presidential campaign over to the usual suspects… which would naturally follow if we win in ’06… well… I fear it’ll be McCain/Guliani in a landslide…

I’ve read a lot of news today and in the past few months. I listen to everyone - even the conspiracy theorists. So what I want to know is if you think of the Clinton years as the “good ole days.” It seems they are, but let’s not rush to wish for a Clinton-like president. He was a shill and is now showing his colors as the “surrogate son” of the Bush family.
Although I will more than likely vote Democrat in whatever upcoming elections I’m alive to see, I don’t want a “cardboard cut out” politician (Nader) such as John Kerry. Even Howard Dean scares me a little, but I think he would make an OK candidate worthy of my vote.
CSPAN replayed Howard Dean’s speech from Monday to an audience in Washington D.C. Dean, the chairman for the Democratic National Party, appeared composed and collected, even telling a joke that the crowd treated like a “killer” at a comedy club. As a loud click interrupted his speech for a few seconds, he looked under the podium and asked, “Is Karl Rove in here?”
At that moment it seemed Dean will likely be the poll leader for the Democrats ‘08 if he decides to run for president. He knows what to expect - particularly a media frenzy that killed his public image in ‘04. He levels with people better than the public-relations jewel for the GOP than George W Bush in ‘02. He admits to possessing great wealth, but will introduce plans to balance the budget, reduce the deficit and eliminate tax cuts for the wealthy.
I’ll be damned if he is lying. He has no reason to lie other than him being a shill to the establishment politician in D.C. We don’t need this. We all need to analyze our presidential candidates very carefully. The Democrats are to get handed the torch of liberty by the people. They better not ruin their chance.
ha… nope - I, like Digby, think Clinton was the best Republican president of my lifetime…
politics has become an tool of border-free corporate interests… there used to be a time when gov’t could address things like monopolies and other cut-throat business practices…
no more…