Comments on: Liar. http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/24/liar/ Kickin' ass on the lyin' side: A never-ending battle against stupid, ugly, deceitful and corrupt right-wing water carriers... Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:30:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: chuck 2 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/24/liar/#comment-1125 chuck 2 Tue, 28 Mar 2006 01:20:50 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/24/liar/#comment-1125 No response from Bob yet. No response from Bob yet.

]]> By: chuck 2 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/24/liar/#comment-1111 chuck 2 Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:12:00 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/24/liar/#comment-1111 Bob Why do you personally attack people you disagree with? Hopefully, Sue will post again and tell us her source for the points she raised. However, one made she made was: "Commercial emails, like hotmail, are blocked because of fears of sabotage. I assume you are okay with that, right?" The article I quoted said something very similar to Sue's point: "But access to such services leaves the unclassified government network too susceptible to hackers and computer viruses, said Neal Miller, a senior plans and policy manager with Naval Network Warfare Command in Norfolk, Va." “By going through some of the commercial Web-based e-mail accounts, it opens up vulnerabilities to government-run networks and presents too high [of a] risk to be acceptable,” Miller said. It would seem to any fair minded person this quote and article backs up that one point which Sue mentioned. This Miller guy works for Naval Warfare Command in Norfolk, Va. He would seem like a credible source to me. Bob

Why do you personally attack people you disagree with?

Hopefully, Sue will post again and tell us her source for the points she raised. However, one made she made was:

“Commercial emails, like hotmail, are blocked because of fears of sabotage. I assume you are okay with that, right?”

The article I quoted said something very similar to Sue’s point:

“But access to such services leaves the unclassified government network too susceptible to hackers and computer viruses, said Neal Miller, a senior plans and policy manager with Naval Network Warfare Command in Norfolk, Va.”

“By going through some of the commercial Web-based e-mail accounts, it opens up vulnerabilities to government-run networks and presents too high [of a] risk to be acceptable,” Miller said.

It would seem to any fair minded person this quote and article backs up that one point which Sue mentioned. This Miller guy works for Naval Warfare Command in Norfolk, Va. He would seem like a credible source to me.

]]> By: Bob http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/24/liar/#comment-1110 Bob Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:22:45 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/24/liar/#comment-1110 Hi Chuckie, remember me??? I was the first to draw attention to the fact that you lack, well, BALLS. And I called you the Angry Puss. Ah, the good old days. I miss 'em. Now I'm here to say that Sue is full of turds, sort of like you, Chuck. And Chuck, I've asked you before to stop pretending to be a lawyer. There you go again, quoting stuff, making it appear like you're all official and everything. An Air America stream of 16.1 kbps is hardly a bandwidth issue. Why, even a lowly 56k dialup modem can handle that one. Hell, a tin can and string could handle that bandwidth issue, Susie-Q. Or maybe Susie-Shrew is a better designation. That's one lie, dear. I'll just assume that everything else you wrote is made up, too. You pull stuff out of your ass, like Chuck, don't you! Oh, and Susie: Have you met Chuck? Perhaps we could be a sort of e-Harmony here and bring you both together. I'm thinking that two half-brains like you might make sweet brain farts together. Hi Chuckie, remember me??? I was the first to draw attention to the fact that you lack, well, BALLS. And I called you the Angry Puss. Ah, the good old days. I miss ‘em.

Now I’m here to say that Sue is full of turds, sort of like you, Chuck. And Chuck, I’ve asked you before to stop pretending to be a lawyer. There you go again, quoting stuff, making it appear like you’re all official and everything.

An Air America stream of 16.1 kbps is hardly a bandwidth issue. Why, even a lowly 56k dialup modem can handle that one. Hell, a tin can and string could handle that bandwidth issue, Susie-Q. Or maybe Susie-Shrew is a better designation.

That’s one lie, dear. I’ll just assume that everything else you wrote is made up, too. You pull stuff out of your ass, like Chuck, don’t you!

Oh, and Susie: Have you met Chuck? Perhaps we could be a sort of e-Harmony here and bring you both together. I’m thinking that two half-brains like you might make sweet brain farts together.

]]> By: chuck 2 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/24/liar/#comment-1106 chuck 2 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:58:15 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/24/liar/#comment-1106 It is too bad Sue could not give any sources for her points. Perhaps she or maybe a friend or husband is in the Military and that is how she knows the ins and outs of the blocking policies. This article would seem to support Sue's point that security concerns are behind the blocking and not something political. “This concerns us, because so many of our patrons won’t be able to access their e-mail, and many come to the library to do just that,” said Ciro Giordano, supervisory librarian at Naval Support Activity Naples, Italy. "But access to such services leaves the unclassified government network TOO SUSCEPTIBLE TO HACKERS AND COMPUTER VIRUSES, said Neal Miller, a senior plans and policy manager with Naval Network Warfare Command in Norfolk, Va. “By going through some of the commercial Web-based e-mail accounts, it opens up vulnerabilities to government-run networks and presents too high [of a] risk to be acceptable,” Miller said. "The policy covers sailors, Marines and DOD employees and contractors using Navy Department computers, and applies to those downrange who operate on Navy computer systems." http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,78905,00.html?ESRC=eb.nl It is too bad Sue could not give any sources for her points. Perhaps she or maybe a friend or husband is in the Military and that is how she knows the ins and outs of the blocking policies. This article would seem to support Sue’s point that security concerns are behind the blocking and not something political.

“This concerns us, because so many of our patrons won’t be able to access their e-mail, and many come to the library to do just that,” said Ciro Giordano, supervisory librarian at Naval Support Activity Naples, Italy.

“But access to such services leaves the unclassified government network TOO SUSCEPTIBLE TO HACKERS AND COMPUTER VIRUSES, said Neal Miller, a senior plans and policy manager with Naval Network Warfare Command in Norfolk, Va.

“By going through some of the commercial Web-based e-mail accounts, it opens up vulnerabilities to government-run networks and presents too high [of a] risk to be acceptable,” Miller said.

“The policy covers sailors, Marines and DOD employees and contractors using Navy Department computers, and applies to those downrange who operate on Navy computer systems.”

http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,78905,00.html?ESRC=eb.nl

]]> By: Mike Stark http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/24/liar/#comment-1103 Mike Stark Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:36:34 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/03/24/liar/#comment-1103 Well Sue, We can believe you or the Marine... What streams from Wonkette? sabatoge - please, spare me... from Hotmail... critical thinking is a wonderful thing too... instead of lying prone before Dear Leader, why don't you address a 2 point fucking 2 pay raise proposal? Well Sue,

We can believe you or the Marine…

What streams from Wonkette?

sabatoge - please, spare me… from Hotmail…

critical thinking is a wonderful thing too… instead of lying prone before Dear Leader, why don’t you address a 2 point fucking 2 pay raise proposal?

]]>