The reason Baldwin brought up Hannity’s past is because he knows it gets to him. The reason Hannity brought up Baldwin’s ex-wife is because he knows it will get to him.

This “exchange” was something from a 5th grade recess and both parties are to blame for acting like children.

Why you are defending Hannity , yet chastizing Baldwin for the same thing?

Also, it is widely known in talk radio that Baldwin has been trying to break into talk radio and his agent has been shopping him around to different shows.

C’mon, you guys really have to give it up on this. Just admit that the guy is an elitist Hollywood putz. The guy puts down construction workers and people from Long Island, even though that is where he is from. I guess if you’re not a Hollywood star, then your opinion doesn’t count. CLASSIC LIMOUSINE LIBERAL!

If Alec Baldwin is so irrelevant, why is sean so upset that Alec wont go on his show?

Sounds like sour grapes to me!

Also, what does hannity mean in Gailic?

“Ezsuds 81
Hannity hung up on Mike because he wants more intelligent and more interesting liberals on the air. Mike has been on Hannity’s show many times, we have all heard his points, which aren’t very coherent, or interesting and are unsupported (check the “Maybe I’m nuts” post where Hewitt asks Mike for citation and Mike cannot provide anything). Mike has had his shot with Hannity, and it’s time for more intelligent and thought provoking liberals to get on the air.”

You always talk about evidence… What evidence do you have that this is why Hannity hung up on Mike. That is your own assertion because you don’t like Mike’s politics and you don’t like his website even though you spend an incredible amount of time here. The truth is Hannity hung up on Mike simply because he has put the neo-cons in a small corner by posting their inconsistencies. Whether the arguments are perfect are not it has made the likes of O’Reilly and Hannity cower under their desks.

Why didn’t you answer this post because then not 10 posts later you accuse someone of doing exactly what you did earlier in the thread. Say shit without presenting facts… Here is your post again just so you can see how ridiculous you sound when you are doing the exact same thing.

Do you have evidence or sources that show your assertion that:

If not what is that assertion based on? Listening to a 10 min phone call? Hannity is on the air hundreds of hours per year. In order for your assertion to be correct, you would have to show a consistent pattern by Hannity over the hundreds of hours he is on the radio and tv each year. If you cannot do this, then you should retract your assertion.

a) with no notice;

b) two against one; and

c) do both of these things when you have the “home court advantage?”

It does seem that Sean Hannity usually comes out poorly against anyone who: a) knows more than he does; and b) is not willing to be bullied by a pea-wit. The man’s standard answer is the ad hominem attack because that seems to be all he can muster. It really was a pathetic effort, but that seems to be his best.