<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sean Hannity defends Tom Delay</title>
	<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/04/sean-hannity-defends-tom-delay/</link>
	<description>Kickin' ass on the lyin' side:  A never-ending battle against stupid, ugly, deceitful and corrupt right-wing water carriers...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 03:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: kln;klnsca</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/04/sean-hannity-defends-tom-delay/#comment-1424</link>
		<author>kln;klnsca</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/04/sean-hannity-defends-tom-delay/#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>partisan politics is nothing more than cheerleading, it is mind-numbing, yet, it is strangely addictive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>partisan politics is nothing more than cheerleading, it is mind-numbing, yet, it is strangely addictive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAJ McDermott</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/04/sean-hannity-defends-tom-delay/#comment-1423</link>
		<author>MAJ McDermott</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/04/sean-hannity-defends-tom-delay/#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>I guess we can go back and forth and accuse each other of who "hates" the most.  I think its sad and in a way funny.  Lets not ever get into substance, lets just stick to debating who has the most venom.  That's real intelligent.  

I admit that I am a slow learner.  I should know by now that not many on the left is interested in a real debate.  They blame everything on Bush and the conservatives.  From hurricanes to the immigration debate - its all Bush's fault.  

I should know by now that nobody is going to go into any debate with an open mind.  Nobody is going to change their point of view so its kinda pointless.  I guess, based on the sound of Mike's voice and his maturity level displayed on this particular call - that he (Mike) was in his early 20s.  If he's 37 then there is no growing up, maturing, etc.  He is what he is for better or for worse.  

I will leave you all with this quote that I saw on another website:

"Give a Liberal a thought and he'll repeat it mindlessly all day.  Teach a Liberal to think for himself and he'll vote Republican (or Libertarian) for the rest of his life."

People can laugh, joke, criticize, or even attack but I do think that quote is a nice summation of how things are with many liberals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we can go back and forth and accuse each other of who &#8220;hates&#8221; the most.  I think its sad and in a way funny.  Lets not ever get into substance, lets just stick to debating who has the most venom.  That&#8217;s real intelligent.  </p>
<p>I admit that I am a slow learner.  I should know by now that not many on the left is interested in a real debate.  They blame everything on Bush and the conservatives.  From hurricanes to the immigration debate - its all Bush&#8217;s fault.  </p>
<p>I should know by now that nobody is going to go into any debate with an open mind.  Nobody is going to change their point of view so its kinda pointless.  I guess, based on the sound of Mike&#8217;s voice and his maturity level displayed on this particular call - that he (Mike) was in his early 20s.  If he&#8217;s 37 then there is no growing up, maturing, etc.  He is what he is for better or for worse.  </p>
<p>I will leave you all with this quote that I saw on another website:</p>
<p>&#8220;Give a Liberal a thought and he&#8217;ll repeat it mindlessly all day.  Teach a Liberal to think for himself and he&#8217;ll vote Republican (or Libertarian) for the rest of his life.&#8221;</p>
<p>People can laugh, joke, criticize, or even attack but I do think that quote is a nice summation of how things are with many liberals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odanny</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/04/sean-hannity-defends-tom-delay/#comment-1418</link>
		<author>odanny</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/04/sean-hannity-defends-tom-delay/#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>Sean Hannity LOVES talking about "liberal venom" while he, like almost all Wingnut radio hosts, have made a career of spewing poison and he uses his show as a bully pulpit to attack Liberals, and he clearly lined you up Mike and beat you like a drum. When he slowed down enough on his rant attacking all Liberals as being exactly what Hannity himself is (full of vitriol and hatred) you should have quickly counterattacked with any of the laundry list of issues that Republicans and their entire party of allegiance, cowed silence and corruption stand guilty of.

You are generally able to hit these people at the most opportune times but while Hannity was ranting towards the closing of that call you should have not let him get away so easy without challenging him before he hung up on you.

These people are pathological, they will attack clear thinking Americans who oppose their suicidal policies, bankrupted national debt, runaway spending and this utter debacle in Iraq because they are too cowardly to ever admit they dont get it, not now, not 5 years ago, and not ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean Hannity LOVES talking about &#8220;liberal venom&#8221; while he, like almost all Wingnut radio hosts, have made a career of spewing poison and he uses his show as a bully pulpit to attack Liberals, and he clearly lined you up Mike and beat you like a drum. When he slowed down enough on his rant attacking all Liberals as being exactly what Hannity himself is (full of vitriol and hatred) you should have quickly counterattacked with any of the laundry list of issues that Republicans and their entire party of allegiance, cowed silence and corruption stand guilty of.</p>
<p>You are generally able to hit these people at the most opportune times but while Hannity was ranting towards the closing of that call you should have not let him get away so easy without challenging him before he hung up on you.</p>
<p>These people are pathological, they will attack clear thinking Americans who oppose their suicidal policies, bankrupted national debt, runaway spending and this utter debacle in Iraq because they are too cowardly to ever admit they dont get it, not now, not 5 years ago, and not ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bacci40</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/04/sean-hannity-defends-tom-delay/#comment-1372</link>
		<author>bacci40</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 07:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/04/sean-hannity-defends-tom-delay/#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>maj and chuck....

we libs are the "kool-aide" drinkers?

have you watched what is going on in this country, thanks to one party republican rule?

everything you alledge to despise...deficits, out of control spending, pork barrell projects, corruption in dc, etc has run amok.

You have allowed the social conservatives to take control of the party...and to its detriment....

And in spite of that...it is the social conservatives who scream and curse about being "victimized"

And your party cant even get immigration right....or did you not pay attention to the bill passed by the senate today.

btw, I heard hannity and levin pull their own mike when they called in to rag on alec baldwin....and neither sounded like mature adult males.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maj and chuck&#8230;.</p>
<p>we libs are the &#8220;kool-aide&#8221; drinkers?</p>
<p>have you watched what is going on in this country, thanks to one party republican rule?</p>
<p>everything you alledge to despise&#8230;deficits, out of control spending, pork barrell projects, corruption in dc, etc has run amok.</p>
<p>You have allowed the social conservatives to take control of the party&#8230;and to its detriment&#8230;.</p>
<p>And in spite of that&#8230;it is the social conservatives who scream and curse about being &#8220;victimized&#8221;</p>
<p>And your party cant even get immigration right&#8230;.or did you not pay attention to the bill passed by the senate today.</p>
<p>btw, I heard hannity and levin pull their own mike when they called in to rag on alec baldwin&#8230;.and neither sounded like mature adult males.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck 2</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/04/sean-hannity-defends-tom-delay/#comment-1368</link>
		<author>chuck 2</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/04/sean-hannity-defends-tom-delay/#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>MAJ McDermott 

Yes, Mike has been on Hannity before and has sounded at least more mature than he did in this call.

"I thought perhaps an opposing point of view might stimulate a true debate. I was wrong."

I thought the same thing. I thought I could stimulate debate here. However, I either get cussed out or blocked by Mike. So eventually I lose my temper sometimes and start calling others here names because I get so frustrated with the lack of mature debate.

"You’ll look back on this with regret. You’ll either regret that you missed out on a chance to have a debate with Hannity or you’ll regret that you were so misguided in your youth."

Just want to let you know, Mike is 37 years old. I guess that's still young but Mike is not some high school student although he acts like one often.

Keep up trying to stimulate debate. Don't get dragged down into name calling by other immature people. I will try to do the same as long as Mike does not block me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAJ McDermott </p>
<p>Yes, Mike has been on Hannity before and has sounded at least more mature than he did in this call.</p>
<p>&#8220;I thought perhaps an opposing point of view might stimulate a true debate. I was wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought the same thing. I thought I could stimulate debate here. However, I either get cussed out or blocked by Mike. So eventually I lose my temper sometimes and start calling others here names because I get so frustrated with the lack of mature debate.</p>
<p>&#8220;You’ll look back on this with regret. You’ll either regret that you missed out on a chance to have a debate with Hannity or you’ll regret that you were so misguided in your youth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just want to let you know, Mike is 37 years old. I guess that&#8217;s still young but Mike is not some high school student although he acts like one often.</p>
<p>Keep up trying to stimulate debate. Don&#8217;t get dragged down into name calling by other immature people. I will try to do the same as long as Mike does not block me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
