Comments on: E tu Bill O’Reilly?? Rumsfeld must be toast! http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/14/bill-oreilly-rumsfeld-must-be-toast/ Kickin' ass on the lyin' side: A never-ending battle against stupid, ugly, deceitful and corrupt right-wing water carriers... Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:08:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Interrogator http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/14/bill-oreilly-rumsfeld-must-be-toast/#comment-1855 Interrogator Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:09:16 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/14/bill-oreilly-rumsfeld-must-be-toast/#comment-1855 I really thought the same thing until I read this Greg Palast article on his site and it sort of was somewhere between a littlebulb moment and 'doesn't really surprise me': http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=493&row=1 I really thought the same thing until I read this Greg Palast article on his site and it sort of was somewhere between a littlebulb moment and ‘doesn’t really surprise me’:

http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=493&row=1

]]> By: odanny http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/14/bill-oreilly-rumsfeld-must-be-toast/#comment-1773 odanny Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:58:45 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/14/bill-oreilly-rumsfeld-must-be-toast/#comment-1773 Well, Mike, it sounds as though you were trying hard to squeeze in everything and were a little gunshy about your mic. getting cut (I know the Olbermann history) however, when your points are as salient as our military professionals, guys who are BTDT's with stars on their collars, speaking out against the absolute criminally negligent planning for the occupation of Iraq I dont think even O'Reilly is gonna be quick to mute you when you have the backing of our finest military leaders. Take your time, make your points, if O'Reilly were to close you down early when making such sound statements as our civilian chickenhawks making disastrous decisions (Iraq is only one of many) then he would lose credibility. (It should be noted in his famous head to head with Phil Donahue on the "No Spin Zone" one evening he came out and questioned whether or not the Iraq war was a good idea, said it "might not be") so O'Reilly is more openminded than his robotic counterparts on FAUX. Well, Mike, it sounds as though you were trying hard to squeeze in everything and were a little gunshy about your mic. getting cut (I know the Olbermann history) however, when your points are as salient as our military professionals, guys who are BTDT’s with stars on their collars, speaking out against the absolute criminally negligent planning for the occupation of Iraq I dont think even O’Reilly is gonna be quick to mute you when you have the backing of our finest military leaders.

Take your time, make your points, if O’Reilly were to close you down early when making such sound statements as our civilian chickenhawks making disastrous decisions (Iraq is only one of many) then he would lose credibility.

(It should be noted in his famous head to head with Phil Donahue on the “No Spin Zone” one evening he came out and questioned whether or not the Iraq war was a good idea, said it “might not be”) so O’Reilly is more openminded than his robotic counterparts on FAUX.

]]> By: Can'tHang http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/14/bill-oreilly-rumsfeld-must-be-toast/#comment-1765 Can'tHang Sun, 16 Apr 2006 11:29:14 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/14/bill-oreilly-rumsfeld-must-be-toast/#comment-1765 Yeah, Chuck. Who would possibly need to know nonsensical terms frequently found in law and legal writings like: addendum ad hoc a priori a posteriori bona fide corpus delicti de facto ex officio ex post facto fiat habeas corpus in banco in camera in loco parentis lex domicilii lex fori lex loci lex non scripta lex scripta locus delicti mala fide That's just a smattering of phrases among many more. But who needs to know that stuff? Yeah, Chuck. Who would possibly need to know nonsensical terms frequently found in law and legal writings like:

addendum
ad hoc
a priori
a posteriori
bona fide
corpus delicti
de facto
ex officio
ex post facto
fiat
habeas corpus
in banco
in camera
in loco parentis
lex domicilii
lex fori
lex loci
lex non scripta
lex scripta
locus delicti
mala fide

That’s just a smattering of phrases among many more. But who needs to know that stuff?

]]> By: Alex http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/14/bill-oreilly-rumsfeld-must-be-toast/#comment-1727 Alex Sun, 16 Apr 2006 06:10:53 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/14/bill-oreilly-rumsfeld-must-be-toast/#comment-1727 As crazy as Bill O'Reilly can be sometimes, and although he was the one speaking out against everyone who opposed the war at first, I do respect that he is at least taking this stance while so many of his colleagues on Fox News are denying that Iraq is a total mess. As crazy as Bill O’Reilly can be sometimes, and although he was the one speaking out against everyone who opposed the war at first, I do respect that he is at least taking this stance while so many of his colleagues on Fox News are denying that Iraq is a total mess.

]]> By: cosmo http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/14/bill-oreilly-rumsfeld-must-be-toast/#comment-1698 cosmo Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:44:04 +0000 http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/14/bill-oreilly-rumsfeld-must-be-toast/#comment-1698 Mike - Trust me, knowing Latin will not be a key factor in your success in law school. Chuck - is that the best you can come up with? Insulting Mike's Latin? bwwaaaahhhhaaaa Mike - Trust me, knowing Latin will not be a key factor in your success in law school.

Chuck - is that the best you can come up with? Insulting Mike’s Latin? bwwaaaahhhhaaaa

]]>