<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smears</title>
	<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/25/smears/</link>
	<description>Kickin' ass on the lyin' side:  A never-ending battle against stupid, ugly, deceitful and corrupt right-wing water carriers...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 23:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Dar</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/25/smears/#comment-2553</link>
		<author>Dar</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/25/smears/#comment-2553</guid>
		<description>You should have pointed out how Sean himself changed his tune. He bashed Clinton about military operations and now attacks anyone who questions Bush, as hurting the war effort. He has no ideals or convictions of his own. So I don't see how he can question anyone else about their motives. Look up some of his past statements and you'll see he is attacking people for saying the exact same things he said about the Clinton administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have pointed out how Sean himself changed his tune. He bashed Clinton about military operations and now attacks anyone who questions Bush, as hurting the war effort. He has no ideals or convictions of his own. So I don&#8217;t see how he can question anyone else about their motives. Look up some of his past statements and you&#8217;ll see he is attacking people for saying the exact same things he said about the Clinton administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stark</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/25/smears/#comment-2537</link>
		<author>Mike Stark</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/25/smears/#comment-2537</guid>
		<description>I think he was talking about Admiral zinni who may not have been on active duty when he made some of his pro-Iraq war statements...

but that's a canard as well...  the fact that we went into Iraq has very little to do with the competency of Rumsfeld's reign as SecDef.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he was talking about Admiral zinni who may not have been on active duty when he made some of his pro-Iraq war statements&#8230;</p>
<p>but that&#8217;s a canard as well&#8230;  the fact that we went into Iraq has very little to do with the competency of Rumsfeld&#8217;s reign as SecDef.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kln;klnsca</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/25/smears/#comment-2533</link>
		<author>kln;klnsca</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/04/25/smears/#comment-2533</guid>
		<description>near the end it sounds like hannity is saying that one of these generals havent been in the military. theres a little blip that obscures a word or two so im not sure, but do you know if thats what he said? he says "no, in one case it was a guy thats [...] been in the military, so its very different." i must be getting it wrong, seeing as how rediculous that would be, but i also cant imagine what it could have been he said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>near the end it sounds like hannity is saying that one of these generals havent been in the military. theres a little blip that obscures a word or two so im not sure, but do you know if thats what he said? he says &#8220;no, in one case it was a guy thats [&#8230;] been in the military, so its very different.&#8221; i must be getting it wrong, seeing as how rediculous that would be, but i also cant imagine what it could have been he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
