Where’s Osama?
Published by Mike Stark May 4th, 2006 in Sean HannityAll this talk about Zacharias Moussaoui might lead one to believe that we’ve done something meaningful in the war on terror… Nothing could be further from the truth. Somebody remarked that Moussaoui is the “Schemp” of Al Queada. I think we can all agree - even you trolls - that Moussaoui was a joke.
Al qaeda operated in 60 countries on September 10, 2001. They operate in 60 countries today. According to the State Department, there are more terror incidents worldwide today than ever…
And, of course, the real deal is bin Laden. He’s almost become an afterthought…
We can’t let that happen. It’s been 1690 days.
Why do we have less than 10,000 troops in Afghanistan? Why do we have more than 130,000 troops in Iraq?
Or not at all?
10 Responses to “Where’s Osama?”
Leave a Reply
Search
Login
Donations Accepted
You can donate through PayPal in two ways:
Make a one-time donation for the amount entered below and you're billed once, that's it.
Make a recurring monthly donation that bills you monthly for the amount entered below.
Subscribe
Posts- Comments
- Podcast
Jeezus! The standard response for every failure of THIS administration is “Clinton….!”
F’ing losers.
Wake me up on November 8th and let’s celebrate.
small point: i disagree with “And, of course, the real deal is bin Laden.” our failure to catch him is a huge embarrassment, but i dont think he tactically has that much control/importance. al qaeda is more like an idea or a movement than an organization, as i understand it, if we were to cut off the head, it wouldnt change things that much.
al qaida is an American creation [labeled] pre 9 11, born of the first wtc bombing it means “the base” that is all. we [american gov’t] started calling them that. damn you clinton . great work Mike .
Absolutely mind boggling what Hannity pulls out of his ass. “There’s no way to explain to a liberal like you what it takes to find Bin Laden…” - how about looking for a start you retard! The man should be ashamed of the lies he perpetrates in the name of collecting a hefty pay-check.
I agree with Sean at the end there: “look how difficult it was to find Saddam in a spider hold there [in Iraq].”
It follows that if the 130,000 troops directed to Iraq were instead sent to Tora Bora looking for Bin Laden that we’d have him by now.
Sean knows this and that’s why he’s a tool.
Hannity continues to repeat the lie that Clinton was offered Bin Laden by Sudan.
mediamatters.org exposed this lie long ago. http://mediamatters.org/items/200406220008 The 9-11 commission also found “no reliable evidence to support the claim that the Sudan made such an offer.”
If 9-11 happened on Clinton’s watch and 1690 days later he didn’t have Bin Laden every minute of Hannity’s show every day of the week he would be screaming for Clinton’s head.
How does shammity sleep at night?
By the way shammity, the bush cartel knew where Al-Zarqawi was for a year before the invasion of Iraq!!
Why didn’t bush get him? sean,you are such a pompous biased tool!!!!
ps. what does hannity mean in Gailic? I believe Alec Baldwin said it means “a hack”.
I had a feeling that he cuts the mike on Mike right after he finished asking his question and I could not stand to listen to Hannity start tap dancing around the question and start muttering Clinton.
Here we are, how many years after Bin Laden engineered the deadliest day on American soil since 1941? For Hannity to start ranting about Clinton (again, I could not stand to listen to him complete his rant) he HAD NO ANSWER, as none of the wingnuts do! It is inexcusable, indefensible, and illogical that we shifted all our resources to Iraq. It’s like trying to rescue the hostages in Tehran when the Ayatollah took over by invading Libya instead.
There never was any threat, everyone knows this, even the most loyal Kool Aid drinkers like Sean, they have no answera, and bringing up Clinton only drives the point home.
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose change
a movie that raises questions about bush’s, osama’s roles in 9/11, and other questions as well. most of it is kinda weak, but still a good movie
Osama who?