<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best call ever&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/07/the-best-call-ever/</link>
	<description>Kickin' ass on the lyin' side:  A never-ending battle against stupid, ugly, deceitful and corrupt right-wing water carriers...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: retin</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/07/the-best-call-ever/#comment-4279</link>
		<author>retin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/07/the-best-call-ever/#comment-4279</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;retin...&lt;/strong&gt;

retin
Your boss climbed the corporate ladder, wrong by wrong.
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>retin&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>retin<br />
Your boss climbed the corporate ladder, wrong by wrong.<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/07/the-best-call-ever/#comment-3724</link>
		<author>Joyce</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 15:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/07/the-best-call-ever/#comment-3724</guid>
		<description>It has been my experience that 'cornered' guilty MALES resort to word usage such as BITTER, NEUROTIC, CRAZY, OR HYSTERICAL etc, when confronted by a female. Add to Rush's faulty characteristics, SEXIST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been my experience that &#8216;cornered&#8217; guilty MALES resort to word usage such as BITTER, NEUROTIC, CRAZY, OR HYSTERICAL etc, when confronted by a female. Add to Rush&#8217;s faulty characteristics, SEXIST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/07/the-best-call-ever/#comment-3080</link>
		<author>Ann Kennedy</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 23:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/07/the-best-call-ever/#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>Alice, you are the greatest !  You brightened the day of 
millions. Mike, thank you for publishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice, you are the greatest !  You brightened the day of<br />
millions. Mike, thank you for publishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rush and the &#8220;culture of corruption&#8221; at Calling All Wingnuts</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/07/the-best-call-ever/#comment-2990</link>
		<author>Rush and the &#8220;culture of corruption&#8221; at Calling All Wingnuts</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 20:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/07/the-best-call-ever/#comment-2990</guid>
		<description>[...] Do you think it might have something to do with this?  Or this recommended diary over at Kos?  Listen Now: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Do you think it might have something to do with this?  Or this recommended diary over at Kos?  Listen Now: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douggie g</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/07/the-best-call-ever/#comment-2989</link>
		<author>douggie g</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 20:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/07/the-best-call-ever/#comment-2989</guid>
		<description>Or another response to the Enquirer question would have been, "Well, the Enquirer had a lot of news about Bill Clinton that you ran with. So were they wrong then or are they wrong now?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or another response to the Enquirer question would have been, &#8220;Well, the Enquirer had a lot of news about Bill Clinton that you ran with. So were they wrong then or are they wrong now?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
