<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Gibson:  short and sweet</title>
	<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/18/john-gibson-short-and-sweet/</link>
	<description>Kickin' ass on the lyin' side:  A never-ending battle against stupid, ugly, deceitful and corrupt right-wing water carriers...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: odanny</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/18/john-gibson-short-and-sweet/#comment-3456</link>
		<author>odanny</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 18:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/18/john-gibson-short-and-sweet/#comment-3456</guid>
		<description>We went in at the same time (Nov. '85) and got out close to the same time, cool.

As far as Gibson, he really is not nearly as pathological as Hannity and really beating him to submission, when the facts are on your (our) side is not difficult. Hannity and Limbaugh, however, can prattle on endlessly, without you being able to respond, and in the process distrot and twist the facts, leaving anyone on the defensive from their inaccurate but effective talking points.

Again, the ability to process these distortions and rebut them quickly without these wingnuts getting you dragged OT is the key to beating them in any discussion in my opinion.

This one was easy. Good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We went in at the same time (Nov. &#8216;85) and got out close to the same time, cool.</p>
<p>As far as Gibson, he really is not nearly as pathological as Hannity and really beating him to submission, when the facts are on your (our) side is not difficult. Hannity and Limbaugh, however, can prattle on endlessly, without you being able to respond, and in the process distrot and twist the facts, leaving anyone on the defensive from their inaccurate but effective talking points.</p>
<p>Again, the ability to process these distortions and rebut them quickly without these wingnuts getting you dragged OT is the key to beating them in any discussion in my opinion.</p>
<p>This one was easy. Good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/18/john-gibson-short-and-sweet/#comment-3446</link>
		<author>Frank</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 16:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/18/john-gibson-short-and-sweet/#comment-3446</guid>
		<description>Not to be negative or anything - hey, you did a great job! - but Gibson is some of the lower hanging fruit (no pun intended). He's not that bright. 

Hanity and this Tammy bitch are among the real toughies. They're despicable, but they know what they're doing. Heck, Franken interviewed Hannity and struggled with him. They do an excellent job of keeping the ball on YOUR side of the net. It's a sales tactic that lends itself well to "debate," if what passes for right wing radio chat can be called that. There are techniques to counter this... We've got to get some sales guys to chime in here and tell us how to handle it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be negative or anything - hey, you did a great job! - but Gibson is some of the lower hanging fruit (no pun intended). He&#8217;s not that bright. </p>
<p>Hanity and this Tammy bitch are among the real toughies. They&#8217;re despicable, but they know what they&#8217;re doing. Heck, Franken interviewed Hannity and struggled with him. They do an excellent job of keeping the ball on YOUR side of the net. It&#8217;s a sales tactic that lends itself well to &#8220;debate,&#8221; if what passes for right wing radio chat can be called that. There are techniques to counter this&#8230; We&#8217;ve got to get some sales guys to chime in here and tell us how to handle it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c.d.</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/18/john-gibson-short-and-sweet/#comment-3409</link>
		<author>c.d.</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 01:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/18/john-gibson-short-and-sweet/#comment-3409</guid>
		<description>very good showing at the circus.  keep it up Mike  .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good showing at the circus.  keep it up Mike  .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john x</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/18/john-gibson-short-and-sweet/#comment-3379</link>
		<author>john x</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 15:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/18/john-gibson-short-and-sweet/#comment-3379</guid>
		<description>from marine to lawyer. you should definately consider politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from marine to lawyer. you should definately consider politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KYGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/18/john-gibson-short-and-sweet/#comment-3378</link>
		<author>KYGuy</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 15:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/05/18/john-gibson-short-and-sweet/#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>Mike,
I like the idea of turning the tables audio-wise and making YOU the one on the mic instead of the host.  This way we can actually hear what you say and compare it to the audio the listener hears when the wingnuts pot down your voice so they can go on a rant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
I like the idea of turning the tables audio-wise and making YOU the one on the mic instead of the host.  This way we can actually hear what you say and compare it to the audio the listener hears when the wingnuts pot down your voice so they can go on a rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
