Rush avoids the question…
Published by Mike Stark June 27th, 2006 in UncategorizedI can’t be sure this was broadcast to all of his radio afiliates, but I can tell you that I recorded this from the live-feed from his website.
Of course I asked him!
And of course he blew it off… but hell, I promised y’all that I’d start calling them liars, racists and chickenhawks… Now you can include “sex tourists” in the mix also…
Finally, it’s time to do that thing I don’t like to do again.
If you like the site - if you appreciate the 50-60 hours that go into it every week - please make use of the paypal form on the right. Throw a coupla bucks into the hat…
[UPDATE] I have independent confirmation from two sources that this entire call was broadcast to Rush’s twenty million listeners… That makes my day! They missed the delay!
54 Responses to “Rush avoids the question…”
- 1 Trackback on Jun 27th, 2006 at 3:04 pm
- 2 Trackback on Jun 27th, 2006 at 6:06 pm
- 3 Pingback on Jun 27th, 2006 at 6:13 pm
- 4 Pingback on Jun 28th, 2006 at 12:45 am
- 5 Pingback on Jun 28th, 2006 at 6:34 am
- 6 Trackback on Jun 28th, 2006 at 7:15 am
- 7 Pingback on Jun 29th, 2006 at 8:27 am

Oh…My…GOD!
You, my friend, have got a set of brass ones on ya. I just hope you don’t trip over them. That’d be damned inconvenient.
OH! DAMN!
That was raw, Mike. Awesome, and I hope that this gets sent to Jon Stewart, because he would use this stuff on his show. PURE GOLD.
Thanks for making me spit diet pepsi from my nose.
-Tim
Philly, PA
All I can say is, Bravo.
HHAHAHAHAHA You’re coming up with this shit quicker than Conan now.
I’m at work.. perhaps someone should google “sex tours domincan republic” to see what comes up?
I have to give Rush credit here. You dropped the Sex-trade in the D.R. line in and he didn’t even flinch. I’m guessing he instantly cut off your mic too since you weren’t heard from again.
It would have been great to hear you bring it up again.. perhaps a “now come on Rush, you’d be upset if Bush shut down the Domincan sex trade, wouldn’t you?” but Rush was just too damn slick. Props to Rush for being the best at what he does. He’s king jerk-wad.
very nice work , keep seeding that field .
Wow, so you lied to get on the air — Yes, Mark Twain used a “pen name” but he didn’t lie about his true identity, and in any case, you are no Mark Twain — and then shot out a rhetorical question. That really takes a “brass set.” No, it takes no set at all, Viagra-enhanced or not. All it takes is a telephone and the free time from having no job and a willingness to count your life as having meaning when the same four people post on your blog. Wow, this is like watching some nerd in his basement build homemade Dr. Who props. Kudos do you!
Rush on Keller: “We’re just concerned if this is legal, blah, blah …”
Yes, we’ve just gotten hung up on whether the President is repeatedly and unrepentantly breaking the laws he’s supposed to be enforcing and obeying. What silly buggers we are.
That was cool. Keep up the good work!
An interesting question for next time. Someone commented over at Dkos that methadone is a step-down drug used to help get folks off of opiates. One side effect of methadone is impotence. Could be that the little blue fellas are part of his regular treatment regimen. Could that be why he’s taking the Viagra? Also, where can I find a doctor to prescribe Dominican prostitutes?
Funny part is Mark, your great accomplishment for the day was to troll some site that you yourself consider insignificant.
Let’s see if I have this:
One person actively works towards something he considers important, this is wasted effort.
Other person stumbles upon a Web site, posts some inane and ignorant (not a shot but an assesment, your post is ignorant: Mark Twain-huh??!? Did you think the caller was not forced to lie? The question was not rhetorical, go look ‘er up) comment and he is the lynch pin keeping our society running. That how it works?
A. My personal jihad against idiots like you is FAR more of a lost cause.
B. We *buy* Dr. Who props because while you were honing…whatever skills you obtained in your GED class, we were developing marketable ones that we now reap the benefit from. Now, if you will excuse me, the Ebay auction for that scarf is closing soon…
Jim Derych:
You took the words right out of my mouth.
Mark!!! you say that the same four nerds read this website? make that five, you nerd! Apparently, you also don’t have a life. If you did, you wouldn’t be trolling this website, fool!
I heard it them replay it on AirAmerica a few minutes ago - definitely a FUCKING FANTASTIC CALL, Mike!!!
Too Funny!!! Keep it up!!! (without Viagra of course)
Well, let me try again. I’ll be very polite. You only post callers who agree with you — I mean, posters that agree with you. Is that not fair to say, or am I mistaken? I seem to see you doing the equivalent of hanging up on posters who disagree, taking down their posts or rejecting them — an option the supposedly cowardly hosts you have do not have. Thank you for your time and comments, dear sir.
Rush vacation photos:
http://news.yahoo.com/photo/060624/481/bfbdd569c01642e088ae16f930ca661f;_ylt=AtpTUQqJFAjF4KuptnP0aocDW7oF;_ylu=X3oDMTA4Y20zOW1jBHNlYwNtZXBo
I have this rule for comments: keep them on point and to the extent possible (this is politics, after all), don’t be a dick.
I also don’t post hate speech.
Yes, I agree that post was rude and brought up your family, but “hate speech”? You seem to have a LOT of hatred here for the people you disagree with. Why not reign in some of your own side? Maybe you do, but I sure don’t see it. It harms your ability to presuade.
OH right - I forgot - keep on track. Has it occurred to you that what you’re doing with your personal vendetta against Rush just might be categorized as hate speech or even a personal attack? Back to politics as usual…
And by the way, my post was no more “hate speech” than anything on here and far less than most. It commented on a post that you had deleted, so I can see that it didn’t relate, but it also pointed out that YOU cannot take the same open-fire shots you give to others. How is you callng up and calling hosts names okay, but others can’t post here without you stopping them. You have a huge advantage, and if you’re going to take comments about “huge brass ones” as a compliment, don’t be surprised when people delve into the gutter.
Fronkensteen Jun 27th, 2006 at 4:00 pm
get the heck out of here with that bull. i’ve every conservative blog i’ve tried to post on has rejected my comments. even if i’ve got a comment or two by they’ve been deleted. it’s interesting how conservatives can criticize liberals for censoring when i have yet to see one conservative blog that doesn’t censor and attack their opponents. Rush shouts calls names and everything under the sun. yet you accuse mike of deleting a few comments, even though i clearly see 2 of your disagreeing comments. tell you what. find 1 john x comment on 1 single conservative blog. you will see them on any given day on a liberal blog. why? who censors?
Ah, the “Conservatives do it so that makes it okay” defense. No, no, Rush does put callers who honestly disagree with him on the air. Mike knows because he listens and he’s honest about that. He just wants to call more than the every two months, to be a regular guest, which Rush will not do. Fine, he was honest with HR and it’s out in the open. It was like the scene between DeNiro and Pacino, “You’re gonna do what you’re gonna do, and I’m gonna do what I have to do” to catch you. It’s my experience that everyone on every blog likes to scream at anyone who posts there with a differing point of view, with vile vitrol they would not say in person. Why not try for a higher standard?
Wow, so you lied to get on the air
You have to lie to get on Rush’s show. He usually doesn’t handle opposition this well (sorry Mike). He screens out anyone representing himself honestly because the few that get through are so embarrassing.
Since my last missive was deleted and Mike obviously can’t really stand the heat afterall, Rush Limbaugh took Viagra to the Dominican Republic to pound one thing or the other, boys or girls.
Too tough for you, Mike, here’s the deal; I’m a conservative — and hence tough — and you, Mike, are a liberal, and hence not tough at all, in any way.
It’s your site, girly man; do what your marshmallow set permits you.
Brass set my ass. More like non-existant.
Wow…. the sudden vitriol… For Christ’s sake…. if you can’t figure out how to say your point with a modicum of class then, might I suggest that a blue pill and some Kleenex in front of a different style site than this could relieve the tension.
I’ve often thought the human condition could be improved if all of us could be lied to by our doctor that we have a terminal condition, then be sent home to live with that idea for a few weeks.
Then these silly pissing contests would end.
Check this out -
In an attempt to get back on point, something many conservatives have a difficult time doing, I’ll discuss your call. I thought you did an excellent job equating the overbearing government of China, with the actions of the Bush administration. The last part of the call where you slipped in the D.R. reference was hysterical. With his hearing problem, I’m not sure Rush really caught that part though.
As far as tolerance of other posters views, I can only speak from my own experience. For 6 or 7 months I periodically visited and posted on the Hannity message board. As you can imagine , the site is overwhelming dominated by “conservative” posters. Some are quite intelligent, and many others just repeat the talking points they hear from Rush and Sean etc. Someone posted what a fine talk show host Andrew Wilkow was. I posted that they could listen to an “interesting” call that he took , and then I posted a link to this site, and Mike’s petri dish call. (If you haven’t heard it, do a site search and listen to it, what a melt down by the host) Anyway, a few weeks later when I attempted to log into the Hannity message board, I received a message that I was banned. I searched back through the moderator threads, and found I was banned for linking to a “HANNITY HATE SITE”. Again the call I linked to had nothing to do with Hannity. Also, although Mike disagrees with Hannity on many points, I don’t know if he hates him. In fact I have heard Mike praise Sean for being one of the few hosts to let him on the air repeatedly, without him having to make up a new name and city. I’ll also say that in my time on the website I was well behaved to those that I disagreed with, and attempted to prove my points politely, and with links to my documentation. So much for the tolerance of a conservative website.
i think you should avoid censorship whenever possible. whenever i see threads like this on blogs, it just makes me wonder what was censored. that said, i really doubt the comment(s) were censored because of differing political beliefs. i see conservatives posting here fairly often (though they dont tend to stay long enough for a real debate). “mike is a girly man” is not a political belief. if it was my blog, which its not, i would only censor when it really becomes a problem, when the personal attacks (or whatever) dominate a thread.
fronkensteen, “Ah, the “Conservatives do it so that makes it okay” defense. No, no, Rush does put callers who honestly disagree with him on the air.”
you honestly dont think rush censors just about every call he lets on the air? peoples’ mics are quieted or silenced, often in quite dishonest ways. mike lets conservatives comment, but he seems to reserve the right to do something similar. that is, he can use his postion of power to control discussions in a way to his liking. i would hope he doesnt abuse that power, but clearly nearly every single talk radio show does, so bringing up rush isnt gonna help your argument in the slightest. i cant defend mike more than that, because only he knows the extent to which he censors.
and fronkensteen, notice that in all of your comments youve attempted to reserve the right to state conservative political beliefs, but you havent mentioned one. have these been censored, or do you care more about trolling than about any substantive issues?
I love that these wing-nut dittoheads are getting their panties in a bunch over Mike “lying” to get on the air. Hys-fucking-sterical! It’s so much easier to belabor that trivial shit than to talk about what a hypocritical, drug/sex addicted lying, fat-ass windbag that their “hero” is…douchebags
oh, and btw, it was a good call
Alright MIKE! You really have the wingnuts hopping!
This one got to them. Fine job–donation coming. If tips are needed, absolutely say so. The Republican types sell their very souls to Wealth but somehow think to decry others for requiring financial sustainability. They will be a hilarious footnote to history.
To me, the doom of the conservatives seems to be endlessly propping up their fallen idols, explaining away their poor behavior and lies way beyond rationality, and so make themselves look as foolish as they are. Please, conservatives, keep frothing forth about your hero, defend him like the mad dogs you seem to be.
I remember the rise of hate radio in America. It was a “r u s h” and it did the job of propaganda, hours upon hours drilled into tired commuters. Rush speaks for the conservative movement, he is the equivalent of their soul. He and it are slowly becoming a laughing stock. A sad kind of laughing stock, with the punch line of corruption.
Rush is the voice of Conservatism. But if he ever sobered up he probably wouldn’t remember a thing.
Frank…. you have a doctors appointment tomorrow.. please be prompt.
Good job, Mike! Shook up the pea-brained trolls, too!
Rico , you are being to kind , girls ?
sorry this was not at rico but at mike, you are being very kind .
Oh, SWEET! Thanks for giving me a laugh on a morning where I was feeling the weight of the world. You rock.
Sean Says, ” I’m a conservative — and hence tough — and you, Mike, are a liberal, and hence not tough at all, in any way.”
What a ridiculous statement. I am constantly astounded by the utter stupidity of these knuckle-dragging jackasses when it comes to their attempts at logic and reason.
Sean, have you any idea of how freakishly stupid you sound when you make a statement like that? I think Mike the Marine should be compelled by a court of law to go to your place of business and stomp a mudhole in your ass just to put a smile on the faces of the poor people who wonder what the hell they did in a past life to deserve working next to a festering pimple like you.
Now, maybe you’d like to squeeze out from behind your computer and meet some actual liberals, and then toss out your pick-up line. Even though we all know how feverishly you hold on to that concept. I mean, it’s the only thing that lets you get to sleep at night isn’t it? Yeah, I thought so. “Oh, I’m tough, alright, ’cause I like Dubya, and he’s tough, too! Yeah, we’re bad, and the libs are all weaklings and not tough… Oohh, I wet myself again”
Jerk off.
Sorry Mike, I couldn’t help myself. Have a good long weekend, everybody.
Thanks for the laugh. That was good. Rush is slick….but you still have to be pretty lame to buy what he’s selling.
Outstanding work.
You are 100% correct with your information. Rush, of course, is lying. We aren’t at War. I’m not sure what this is but it isn’t war.
Great work.
Where’s the Outrage?
If he got a prescription in his doctor’s name, he may have made reservations at the escort resort in his doctor’s name as well “for privacy reasons”.
LOL. You could actually hear the Pigman swallowing his own sweat toward the end there.
Yeah, tell me he DIDN’T go to get some underage action. As with all things Rushbo, I don’t for one instant believe it.
uh, Gary E - I lay out a 6 word post… a one word post, really, days ago… and I’ve captured your attention? Wow, the powers of my prose…
I guess that’s the limit of your reading capacity. All the other posts here, every singly one of them packed with more color, commentary and info than mine were just too long for you to get through…
Frank, looking back, can’t recall who I was responding to, it wasn’t you, perhaps it was a post deleted. It wasn’t to your post. It had something to do with a response to my post that everyone would become better after having received a false fatal diagnosis and be sent home to live with it for a few weeks.
I’m flummoxed!
I heard that a very big political friend of him was indeed in a resort in the Caribbean called charlisangels adult exotic resort, and many other big shots have visited that place before. I can`t blame them, all these exotic hotels are full of blondes from Europe, the thing is who ends up paying the big tickets…. check out the site here: www.charlisangels.com
So Rush goes to the Dominican Republic, then returns with Viagra in his luggage.
From this you deduce that he was having sex with children while he was there.
Damn I knew some people would do anything to hurt Rush, but that is just an enormous stretch.
The fact that Rush was in the DR does not mean he was having sex with children, I checked both websites of those exotic resorts and I found no underaged girls….most of these russian women are between 22-28 years old, I sincerely believe someone wants to wrongly accuse him, just to sink him deeper. cat69.com and charlisangels.com has no women below 22, and the other adult resorts neither promote any children.