“[freder421]I am a vet of the US Army”
“[me]Yes, I have served in the army, and in Iraq, for a coalition country.”
“[popin-in]BTW, you know this guy Oracle never served because he never stated troop, rank, VVA#, nada.”

No bias there, huh? Oh that’s right, it’s perfectly acceptable to challenge the validity of one’s arguments if they’re throwing out point after point that proves how wrong and idiotic your view is. But if some random idiot comes along, says he’s a veteran and that he hates Kilmeade, then crawls back into the hole he came from, well HOLY SHIT WE BETTER CARVE IT IN STONE AND FOLLOW THOU’S COMMANDMENTS!

Here’s the one that really made me laugh though:
“[popin-in]Besides your piss pour spelling (defense, supremacist),”

Not only did you spell your “you can’t spell” insult on me POORly, but you accused me of misspelling a word that wasn’t even wrong! What a fucking riot! But oh, that’s right, I forgot the golden rule; as long as you hate Kilmeade for not being in the army, you can say whatever the fuck you like, however the fuck you want to say it, and spell any damn you want to! And then, that was it. Nothing. You didn’t even try to debate the point. You just nit-picked on one stupid, irrelevent detail (like the spelling), and ignored the actual argument. It wasn’t a one-off, either; pretty much all your posts were like that. And then you have the nerve to try and tell ME how to debate properly! Are you functionally retarded, or what?

Please. Your bias in this debate (which was already won by yours truly long, long ago) is as obvious as your bias with the whole chickenhawk “WE can force our opinions on who we like, but YOU can’t” deal.

But you know what, you’re absolutely right about one thing:
“As Paul Campos said leading up to the Iraqi war “Treating an argument as if it deserves to be taken seriously does not make it so.””

I really should have never taken your chickenhawk “argument” so seriously. Here I was, thinking that you all actually believe in it, when it’s nothing more than a convenient insult for people who are doing a better job of presenting their real argument than you are.

Hey, I just thought of something: You know how I said I was a soldier? You know what would be really funny? If I was a soldier for Iraq. That would be a God-damn laugh riot, that would. It’s so funny if I can destroy half your “argument” by saying I’m a soldier, and finish off the rest by simply saying I’m an Iraqi soldier. Now THAT would be comedy. Of course, the way I’m suggesting it, I probably am not an Iraqi soldier (or AM I?) - but man, it just goes to show you how utterly stupid your opinions are, if you base them around the inividual that just happens to be pointing out how stupid you are at that point in time, rather than any actual logic or rationality, like us normal people do.

Adiós, mis amigos locos.

http://operationyellowelephant.blogspot.com/
http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/
http://www.thismodernworld.com/
Now these are my heroes, I am a woman, and you are a fool.
TA TA bonehead

By the, have you ever considered the possibility that your “office buddies” are only agreeing with you beccause they know how violent and aggressive you become, should someone dare to have the call to challenge your irrational, nutbag conspiracy theories, as demonstrated in these very comments? Wait, scrap that; it’s more of an “almost certain probability” than it is a “possibility”.