He explained in no uncertain terms that the Lebanese people support Hezbollah because Hezbollah supports the people, in all the ways you mentioned above. What’s going on there now is just so incredibly wrong - it’s hard not to despair. People who really know what’s going on have so little control over these events.

Because even the most retarded wingnut has to realize that the logical device I used was called an analogy, or perhaps, a simile…

If you can’t see the parallels between the two situations, you are a very ugly penguin.

Oh - there ya go, just for you, I made a “red herring” - with a little bit of ad homimem thrown in for spice… Now we’ll argue about whether or not you are a penguin - something that has nothing at all to do with the original argument.

The discussion has nothing to with the world trade center or Osama bin laden. Why have you tried to distract the discussion for? We are talking about the current conflict in the mid east, not Osama bin laden. I think that your last post would be considered the logical fallacy of the red herring, which is introducing an argument that has nothing to do with the proceding argument to get the discussion off course. I dont think they like red herrings in law school.

So when the trade centers were blown up, you asked yourself why, right? And when you found out that Osam’s beef was with the United States maintaining bases in Saudi Arabia and propping up their corrupt royal family - while the vast majority of Saudis lived in squalor… well, you decided to tell America you were leaving because you didn’t want people that would do that anywhere near your family, right?

because you are a real deep thinker, huh? more like Corporal markovits in the Hannity Army…

why do I get the feeling your name is really Wilkow?