<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apologies</title>
	<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/07/31/apologies-2/</link>
	<description>Kickin' ass on the lyin' side:  A never-ending battle against stupid, ugly, deceitful and corrupt right-wing water carriers...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Sep 2008 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Yakki</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/07/31/apologies-2/#comment-8794</link>
		<author>Yakki</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/07/31/apologies-2/#comment-8794</guid>
		<description>Frank:

I don't have a clue. I haven't even read the woods hole research yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a clue. I haven&#8217;t even read the woods hole research yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank the Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/07/31/apologies-2/#comment-8784</link>
		<author>Frank the Cat</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/07/31/apologies-2/#comment-8784</guid>
		<description>I hate to rain on anybody's parade (actually, not true. I'm a true wet blanket..), but the studies that are attributed to the Woods Hole Research Center aren't listed at the Woods Hole website. They mention only one study - you'd think that something as drastic as the rainforest turning into a desert would at least warrent a press release. Or is George Bush covering this up too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to rain on anybody&#8217;s parade (actually, not true. I&#8217;m a true wet blanket..), but the studies that are attributed to the Woods Hole Research Center aren&#8217;t listed at the Woods Hole website. They mention only one study - you&#8217;d think that something as drastic as the rainforest turning into a desert would at least warrent a press release. Or is George Bush covering this up too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troll</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/07/31/apologies-2/#comment-8781</link>
		<author>Troll</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/07/31/apologies-2/#comment-8781</guid>
		<description>Go Gillebrand! Sweeney is a repulsive toad (no offense to toads), who's out for no one but himself, despite his campaign lies. He was a Bush butt-boy until he saw Dubya sinking; now he's running away from the fact that he led that disgusting riot in Florida to shut down the vote-count in 2000.
Sweeney learned very early about DC's pay-to-play culture, and has been a leader in special interest rake-ins. Link to DemocracyInAlbany.com to find out more about this lying drunk.
Kirsten Gillebrand will be a breath of fresh air in a district that had to suffer through Gerry Solomon's moronic right-wing rantings and Sweeney's disgraceful tenure. The 20th district has a 2-1 GOP registration, but there are a large number of independents (including myself)who can't wait to vote this creep out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Gillebrand! Sweeney is a repulsive toad (no offense to toads), who&#8217;s out for no one but himself, despite his campaign lies. He was a Bush butt-boy until he saw Dubya sinking; now he&#8217;s running away from the fact that he led that disgusting riot in Florida to shut down the vote-count in 2000.<br />
Sweeney learned very early about DC&#8217;s pay-to-play culture, and has been a leader in special interest rake-ins. Link to DemocracyInAlbany.com to find out more about this lying drunk.<br />
Kirsten Gillebrand will be a breath of fresh air in a district that had to suffer through Gerry Solomon&#8217;s moronic right-wing rantings and Sweeney&#8217;s disgraceful tenure. The 20th district has a 2-1 GOP registration, but there are a large number of independents (including myself)who can&#8217;t wait to vote this creep out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/07/31/apologies-2/#comment-8780</link>
		<author>Lisa</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/07/31/apologies-2/#comment-8780</guid>
		<description>Gillibrand's renewable energy policy will help save the planet and will help our district create new jobs so when you read that story you know you are supporting the right candidate. She's the best candidate in the race, that is for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gillibrand&#8217;s renewable energy policy will help save the planet and will help our district create new jobs so when you read that story you know you are supporting the right candidate. She&#8217;s the best candidate in the race, that is for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakki</title>
		<link>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/07/31/apologies-2/#comment-8765</link>
		<author>Yakki</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 04:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callingallwingnuts.com/2006/07/31/apologies-2/#comment-8765</guid>
		<description>If I remember correctly,the plant growth in cleared rainforest land is secondary growth. Like shrubs and such. Not much heavy,woody growth.

I can't remember for sure,as it's been a long while since I studied any of it,but I think part of the problem is once the hardwood forest is cleared it removes a nutrient base from the ecosystem. Of course,those large plants are generally slow growing anyway(or so I've read,so there's no cycle that can establish itself.

Or something like that. Anyway,it's been a long time so the old memory is really fuzzy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remember correctly,the plant growth in cleared rainforest land is secondary growth. Like shrubs and such. Not much heavy,woody growth.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember for sure,as it&#8217;s been a long while since I studied any of it,but I think part of the problem is once the hardwood forest is cleared it removes a nutrient base from the ecosystem. Of course,those large plants are generally slow growing anyway(or so I&#8217;ve read,so there&#8217;s no cycle that can establish itself.</p>
<p>Or something like that. Anyway,it&#8217;s been a long time so the old memory is really fuzzy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
