Hannity hearts Lieberman (A LOT! MORE THAN THE REPUBLICAN!)
Published by Mike Stark August 4th, 2006 in UncategorizedThis is actually two calls from two different shows on two different days spliced together.
Adigal, from DailyKos (and a Wingnut Spinner that actually got a call from Fox Security back in that O’Reilly dust-up), posted a diary on the first half of this clip - the one where Hannity says he’ll support Lieberman over the Republican in the CT general election.
Once I got him on the record for that, I had to call and say thanks.
Republicans are doing more to elect Ned Lamont than any elected Democrat. (We do need to be careful to give John Kerry props though - he’s one of the few that have come out and endorsed Lamont for the primary. Of course it is fine to be suspect of his motives (why wasn’t ol’ Skull & Bones listening to us when it mattered?) but it cannot be denied that he’s doing the right thing by us (finally)).

Hannity mentioned John Conyers for Judiciary Chairmen. That’s what motivates me for a Dem Congress more than anything else.
Hannity is just another dumb ass Christ Psychotic.
Was Lieberman at the Armed Services hearing with Rumsfeld? (I didn’t watch it, but press accounts I’ve read don’t mention him).
If not, what kind of representation are his constituents getting?
If he had the courage of his convictions, he would have been there supporting Rumsfeld and the Bush administration in their execution of the war. That would have been the kiss of death.
what do you use to host your audio???
I watched part of the Armed Services hearing. With a few exceptions it was an ass-suck fest.
I missed Hillary’s questions though. I heard she tried to take it to Rummy. I’ll be honest she’s not my favorite politician,but I’ll give the gal’s got balls. Glad she stuck in him good.
Democrats are mean to Joe Lieberman. Joe Lieberman just wants to be friends, but they call him names and make him cry. Democrats are mean.
Whenever a a right wing talk show host calls Lieberman a “Good Democrat”, why does it always sound like they’re saying “Good Puppy”?
It always makes me laugh when a wingnut or Loserman comments that Loserman “votes with the Democratic Party 90% of the time”. They ignore the fact that the 10% he votes against the party is on the ENORMOUS issues of our time.
For years Loserman has backstabbed the people he is supposed to be representing. I’m so proud that my native state is going to oust this weasel.
That’s right, facists. Oust all the unorthodox party members. The trains must run on time. Joe’s not a Good German.
Though I still despise Spammity’s interview tactics and stepping over callers just to emote and pose for the audience, he stepped all over you Mike.
Notice, you don’t see this type of fanaticism for The Party Line on the Republican side of the isle. You ignoramouses will NEVER learn. Lamont is not what he seems. YOU are getting a “Good Puppy”, insomuch as the guy is merely pandering and accepting campaign donations that are in direct contradiction to his past record and investments. Notice his increasing history of lying. Notice as well, his inability to debate intelligently beyond the prepared statements; the doctrine of the party.
Fools. You don’t want a political party. You want a Boys & Girls Club with strict membership rules and pagan rituals. Have fun in November. Keep wearing those kaffiyehs.
Irison:
Toomey vs Specter.
Laffey vs Chafee
And there’s more.
Nope - we want a Democrat that doesn’t undermine their own party. If the war was the reason this guy’s being primaried, then you’d see credible runs against Feinstein, Clinton, Nelson in Florida, and a bunch of others.
The reason Joe is being primaried is that he doesn’t represent his constituents.
Why do you hate democracy?
I hate Fox News….
But, I saw the lady running against Jack Murtha on tonite’s show.
One observation.
Hannity looks like a drunk.
He is getting fat and bloated.
keep going Mike, I think you might be driving him to drink….
great site.
I think you are thinking about NeoCOnservatives. They’re the only ones in the mainstream that goose-step. The Dems aren’t all good,no,but far from being authoritarian unlike Neo and Paleo Conservatives. Moderate Conseervatives are all right in my book though. They have a much better grasp on reality than the rest do.
I need to listen to the audio. I didn’t have a chance to listen earlier. That’s why I didn’t comment.
Ehh,I wouldn’t be too sure about that. You might aught to check with some Conservatives about Republican politicians that they consider “traitors” because they don’t tow the Iraqi line. Or those with enough fiscal responsibility to not sign on to every crappy piece of pork that the Pubbie controllers want. Go to freepers or GOP and check it out.
My “ignoramouse”(it’s a type of rat) is learning all the time. He’s as smart as a Republican. Pretty smart ignoramouse if you ask me.
Seldom are any of them “what they seem”. Bushie isn’t “what he seems”. He’s not the common man you know. So why should anyone hold Lamont to a higher standard than Bushco? A little pot/kettle IMO. I’ll even answer the next couple with a single word to illustrate.
Bush
Bush!
That of course gives no Democrat a free pass. There are some extremely dirty Dems out there IMO. However,so far they fail by comparison to the admin right now.
Hmmm….”You’re either with us,or against us.”
I intend to,thank you. It will be wonderful watching the Republican party go down in flames.
Thanks! They are rather comfortable. I really like your jack-boots too.
So Hannity staged his own little Nuremberg Rally at Six Flags. Problem is, none of his “supporters” seem ready to jump in and become soldiers in Iraq and support the home team.
Kind on hard to start a Reich without soldiers, including its leader. Hey Hannity, how ’bout some Army recruitment centers your next “freedom” event, so we can separate the wheat from the chaff. I thinking: all chaff.
Iriseon stated- “you don’t see this type of fanaticism for The Party Line on the Republican side of the isle”
Can you please explain how Tom Delay earned his reputation as “The Hammer” for enforcing party discipline?