American Enterprise Institute
Published by Mike Stark May 15th, 2007 in UncategorizedBohannon had another wingnut on his show last night, this one from the American Enterprise Institute. As it happens, earlier today I got an email from a friend that alerted me to a piece in AEI’s magazine, The American.
In it, the author bemoans that white collar criminals are being treated like common criminals these days. No longer can they get out for a round of golf, some gourmet food or the occasional use of a prostitute… And… oh my… they actually have to live with blacks and hispanics. Well, y’all know I had a few things to say….
14 Responses to “American Enterprise Institute”
Leave a Reply
Search
Login
Donations Accepted
You can donate through PayPal in two ways:
Make a one-time donation for the amount entered below and you're billed once, that's it.
Make a recurring monthly donation that bills you monthly for the amount entered below.
Subscribe
Posts- Comments
- Podcast
Money Quote!
“Crime could be an important issue for Republicans.”
Suggesting Rudy would benefit from that as an issue… priceless.
seeds, thx Mike.
I wonder what Bernie Kerik would have to say about Rudy’s position on crime?
Joe.My.God needs some immediate help Mike. I hope you have a way to contact him.
http://joemygod.blogspot.com/
Red alert withdrawn, Joe.My.God. chose not to do the show ( wise move I think )
smass May 16th, 2007 at 11:28 am
I wonder what Bernie Kerik would have to say about Rudy’s position on crime?
Probably something similar to what Democrat LA William “Cold Cash” Jefferson would say. He will probably beat the rap for the bribe charge because corrupt Dems are in power now and they only investigate Republicans.
Chester May 11th, 2007 at 6:41 pm
Listen to how tough Dixiedork thinks he is. Comedy. It’s probably that blob of pasty flesh Neal Boortz, offended that he’s being labeled a chickenshit out here.
Dixiedork: Nobody’s falling for it. Your kind talks tough and then buys 20 rifles cause they’re too afraid to confront their problems like men. Acts like they’re soldiers when they dodge their call to duty to serve their country. Like Mike Stark did. Or like I did. Or like many more Democrats in Congress did then their coward ass Republican counterparts.
You’re not intimidating anyone, dork.
What war did Mike Stark fight in? I did not force you or Mike Stark to join the Army? Chester is a PUSSY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dixie,
Congrats, you named a corrupt Democrat. Do you really want me to go through the list of corrupt Republicans?
And besides, it’s not the Dem’s place to be investigating this issue. It’s left for the actual legal authorities (police, Feds, etc.) However, a case could (and should) be made for a hearing of the Ethics Committee. But that would be the only recourse inside of Congress.
smass May 17th, 2007 at 10:29 am
Dixie,
Congrats, you named a corrupt Democrat. Do you really want me to go through the list of corrupt Republicans?
Yes, I do because it will highlight how corrupt Republicans are held accountable to obey the law while Democrats are not. Patrick Kennedy, DWI wreck gets off scot-free. He should have been forced to resign if nothing else. Cynthia Mc Kinney assaults a police officer and it takes the voters (not the Congress) to get rid of her. Bill Clinton lies under oath and gets a slap on the wrist. Scooter Libby gets nailed to the cross for something he should never had had to testify about.
Let me see if I understand you dixxie dude. Scooter Libby should never had to testify about what he knew about the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame, but Bill Clinton should have recieved a harsher punishment when he lied about the exact nature of his relationship with Monica Lewinski.
Would you care to explain why you believe Libby should have never testified, while it was so important for Clinton to discuss his extra-marital activities. To me, finding out who divulged the identity of a CIA agent is much more important than finding out who’s lips are wrapped around the President’s cock.
The other obvious difference is Libby was conviced by a jury of his peers on 4 *felony* counts of obstructing justice, while Clinton’s “lie” didn’t even rise to the level of a prosecutable offense.
Yet wingnuts impeached the president over something that wasn’t even a crime, and defend six years of utterly malicious lawbreaking and lying not just to the American people but to Congress and to investigators like Fitzgerald during investigations.
Anyone still a republican? You have no credibility left. Kindly kiss my ass.
So we get it. You call right-wing bogeymen, you make an idiot out of yourself or said bogeyman does it for you, and then you write about it for the plaudits of sycophants. You’re not convincing anyone of anything. You’re not “fighting the good fight.” You’re putting forth shtick, sad and uncompelling in and of itself but still more pathetic coming from someone who is a law student at a top ten school and a vet (and never tires of reminding people of either trait), not to mention forty years old.
Pretty harsh words ‘Mr. Anonymous - May 22nd, 2007 @ 9:09pm’.
Now, go back to redstate to be with your mouthbreathing friends fucktard.
Mike…. Where’s the Newt stuff?